SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 515

S.RANGANATHAN, S.NATARAJAN
Sub Divisional Officer – Appellant
Versus
Mehar Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
C.M.NAYAR, E.C.AGARWAL, PURNIMA BHATT KAK

JUDGMENT

S. RANGANATHAN, J.:— These appeals raise a common point. They arise out of two out of a batch of writ petitions, disposed of by the Punjab & Haryana High Court, which challenged the validity of S. 244 of the Punjab Municipal Act. The High Court concluded that, both on principle and precedent, the provisions should be struck down as they plainly suffer from the taint of unconstitutionality. The State of Punjab has preferred these appeals.

2. The Punjab Municipal Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was an Act to make better provisions for the administration of municipalities in Punjab. The procedure for constituting any local area as a municipality is set out in Ss. 4 to 10 (Chapter II) of the Act. Under S. 4, the State Government is empowered by notification to propose any local area (other than any part of a military cantonment) to be a municipality under the Act. Any inhabitant, who desires to object to such a proposal, can put forward his objections in writing within a specific period. The State Government is obliged to take such objections into consideration. It may then, by a notification, declare the local area to be a municipality of the first, second or third cl














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top