SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.P. THAKKAR AND B.C. RAY, JJ.
Karam Chand, Appellant
Versus
Haryana State Electricity Board and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 4454 of 1985
Decided on 31-10-1988.
Constitution of India,1950 – Article 226 - Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 – Section 3 - Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes - Recruitment and promotion posts - Only question that arises for decision in this appeal is whether an employee promoted to a post reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes is entitled to have his seniority determined from the date of his appointment to the post or his seniority inter se will be reckoned as it was in the class or grade from which he was promoted to a post in a higher rank - Appellant, who is a Scheduled Caste joined service as a Clerk in the Electricity Branch of the Punjab Public Works Department - Terms and conditions of his service were governed by Punjab P.W.D. (Electricity Branch) Provincial Service Class-III (Subordinate Posts) Rules, 1952 - Punjab State Electricity Board was constituted under Section 3 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 and employees of the Electricity Branch were transferred to Board - Conditions of service of the employees were governed by their existing terms and conditions as well as existing service Rules - Haryana State Electricity Board was constituted and appellant was allocated to Haryana State Electricity Board with existing terms and conditions of service - Board being a statutory corporation was requested by letter by the Government to provide for reservation of 22% of vacancies - initial recruitment and promotion posts being filled up by members of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as well as by members of backward classes – Held, appellant is thus senior to respondents Nos. 2 and 3 in the rank of Deputy Superintendent as he was promoted to the said post earlier than the respondents and as such his claim for promotion to the post of Superintendent on the dates when the respondents Nos. 2 and 3 were promoted to such post is legal and valid. It may be mentioned that during the pendency of the writ petition, appellant had been promoted to the post of Superintendent and as such he pleaded in para 6 of the special leave petition that his seniority in the cadre of Deputy Superintendent should not be affected on the basis of the judgments rendered by the High Court - On a consideration of the facts and circumstances stated finding of High Court that the appellant was promoted temporarily and so exception to Rule 9(ii) applies for determination of seniority of appellant as Deputy Superintendent, in court considered opinion, cannot be sustained as court have already held that promotion of the appellant in a reserved vacancy, is a regular one and it does not smack of purely temporary character - Judgments of the High Court in Letters Patent Appeal as well as in the writ petition No. 773 of 1977: (Reported in (1984) 1 Serv LR 442 (Punj & Har) ) are set aside and the appeal is allowed - Respondent is directed to treat the appellant promoted to post of Superintendent from the date the respondents were promoted to the said post and to pay him the emoluments attached to the said post of Superintendent minus the emoluments paid as Deputy Superintendent from that date till the date of his actual appointment as Superintendent - Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT
RAY,J.:— The only question that arises for decision in this appeal is whether an employee promoted to a post reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes is entitled to have his seniority determined from the date of his appointment to the post or his seniority inter se will be reckoned as it was in the class or grade from which he was promoted to a post in a higher rank.
2. The appellant, who is a Scheduled Caste joined service as a Clerk in the Electricity Branch of the Punjab Public Works Department on February 20, 1954. The terms and conditions of his service were governed by the Punjab P.W.D. (Electricity Branch) Provincial Service Class-III (Subordinate Posts) Rules, 1952. In February, 1959 the Punjab State Electricity Board was constituted under Section 3 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 and the employees of the Electricity Branch were transferred to the Board. The conditions of service of the employees were governed by their existing terms and conditions as well as existing service Rules. In 1967 the Haryana State Electricity Board was constituted and the appellant was allocated to the Haryana State Electricity Board with existing terms and conditions of service. The Board being a statutory corporation was requested by letter dated December 13, 1972 by the Government to provide for reservation of 22% of vacancies - initial recruitment and promotion posts being filled up by members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as well as by members of backward classes. The Haryana State Electricity Board adopted the above circular by its Resolution dated March 10, 1976 providing for reservation of posts both for initial recruitment as well as for promotion. The appellant was promoted on September 25, 1973 as Deputy Superintendent. The respondent No. 2 Rajinder Singh Marya was also promoted by the same order as Deputy Superintendent. In the said order of appointment the following note was appended :-
"The earlier promotion of the above officials as Deputy Superintendent, will not confer upon them any right to claim seniority over those who may otherwise be senior to them due to any reason whatsoever."
3. On April 27,1972 a circular was issued by the Chief Secretary, Government of Haryana to all its departments regarding reservation for members of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in service and fixation of seniority. Paragraphs 2 and 4 of the said circular which are relevant are quoted hereinbelow :-
"2. It has to be pointed out that this was irregular and inter se seniority of all the candidates taken together (i.e. whether appointed against reserved vacancies or against open ones) must be fixed according to the combined merit list and not otherwise. Vacancies assigned to Scheduled Castes/Backward Classes under block system are so assigned for the purposes of reservation only and are not intended for fixing inter se seniority of the candidates contrary to their order in the combined merit list prepared by the Public Service Commission/Subordinate Service Selection Board.
..............
4. The above instructions, regarding determination of inter se seniority will, however, apply only in those cases where the departmental service rules do not provide for seniority being determined from the date of joining or from the date of confirmation or by a method otherwise than the merit determined by the Public Service Commission/S. S. S. Board. In other words, in all cases where the service rules have not yet been framed, or where the service rules provide for seniority being determined according to the merit laid down by the Commissioner/S. S. S. Board, the seniority of the officials shall be determined in the manner stated above. In other cases, where the service rules specifically provide for seniority being determined from the date of joining or from the date of confirmation by the recruiting authority the seniority shall be determined by such different methods."
4. As the seniority of the appellant was not dete
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.