SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 646

G.L.OZA, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, M.M.DUTT
Umesh Chandra Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Oil And Natural Gas Commission – Respondent


Advocates:
B.DUTTA, P.H.Parekh, R.F.NARIMAN, R.K.Joshi, S.K.JAIN, Shashir Sharma

JUDGMENT

JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.:— This appeal by Special Leave arises out of a Judgment of the Gujarat High Court dismissing the appellants Special Civil Application No. 1222 of 1973. The appellants are employees of the Oil and Natural Gas Commission. They were appointed in the basic pay scale of Rs. 120/- as Technicians Grade III. Respondents 3 to 9 are also employees in the same establishment but in Grade II. Their basic pay scale was Rs. 175/-. The contention of the appellants is that there is practically no difference in the nature of duties and responsibilities of Technicians Grade II and Grade III. and therefore, they are entitled to be treated and paid as Technicians Grade II. The management refused to accede to their request. They approached the Gujarat High Court for a direction against the management to treat them on equal terms with respondents 3 to 9 from the date of their respective appointments. There also they could not succeed. So they are now before us.

2. It is not in dispute and indeed cannot be disputed that the appellants were recruited as Technicians Grade III. Respondents 3 to 9 were recruited as Technicians Grade II. It is the case of the management that there










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top