SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 736

M.M.DUTT, S.NATARAJAN
Piyush Kantilal Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Police. Ahmedabad City – Respondent


JUDGMENT

DUTT, J. :— In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the legality of the order of his detention dated August 3, 1988 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad City, under sub-section (2) of S. 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985, hereinafter referred to as the Act.

2. The grounds on which the impugned order of detention has been made run into seven pages. The relevant portions of which are extracted below :-

"In pursuance to Section 9(l) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985, Shri Piyush Kantilal Shah is hereby informed the grounds of detention as under :-

You are indulging into anti-social activities by hoarding illegal foreign liquor and also selling it through yourself and through your servants near Navrangpura Municipal Busstand and Navrang High School, Ahmedabad That the cases have been registered against you under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and in which you have been arrested.

Sr. No. Police Stn. C. R.No. Sections Qty. seized Result

1. Navrangpura 62/88 Prohibition Act - 66(b), 65(a), (e), 81 217950 ML Ltr. foreign liquor Pending

2. Navrangpura 114/88 Proh. Act 66(b), 65(a)(e), 116(b) and 98. 139750

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top