SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 12

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, S.RANGANATHAN
Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sunder Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
ARUNESHVAR GUPTA, D.K.KAPUR, HARISH N.SLAVE, INDU GOSWAMI, RAJINDER SACHAR

JUDGMENT

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI J.:— This appeal by special leave is from the judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi dated 30th of Jan. 1986. The order in question was passed by the High Court in second appeal. In order to appreciate the controversy in this appeal, it is necessry to refer to certain facts. In 1947 three rooms and a courtyard in Premises Nos. 2216-2222, Gali Inder Chammar Teliwara, Delhi as an Evacuee Property was given on tenancy to the appellant by the Custodian of the Evacuee property. In 1956, the entire property was jointly purchased by the father of the respondent and Smt. Sham Kaur from the Custodian of the Evacuee property. Smt. Sham Kaur had paid 50 per cent of the consideration money, i.e., Rs. 25,700/- towards the sale amount. It was a joint purchase. Smt. Sham Kaur died in 1975 and her legal heirs became the co-landlords of the disputed premises. In June, 1975 the father of the respondents had filed an Eviction Petition against the appellant on the ground that the premises in question was required bona fide by the landlord under S. 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, hereinafter called the said Act. Legal heirs of Smt. Sham Kaur were, howev
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top