SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 19

S.NATARAJAN, A.M.AHMADI
Sukhram S/o Ramratan – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
C.S.S.RAO, Uma Nath Singh

JUDGMENT

NATARAJAN, J.:— The appellant Sukhram and his cousin one Gokul were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Dewas under Section 302 read with Section 34 I.P.C. and under Section 436 read with Section 34 I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life and concurrently to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years for the respective convictions. On appeal, the High Court confirmed the convictions and sentences awarded to the appellant but gave the benefit of doubt to accused Gokul and acquitted him of both the charges. The appellant has preferred this appeal by special leave against the judgment of the High Court confirming the convictions and sentences awarded to him.

2. The prosecution case briefly stated was that Gokul and the appellant bore a grudge against P.W. 1 Gendalal because of his refusal to return a sum of Rs. 400/- collected as fine from Gokul by the caste panchayatdars and left in deposit with P.W. 1 Gendalal. It would appear that about four years before the incident which took place on the night of 1/2 May, 1979, the panchayatdars chastised Gokul for having illicit intimacy with his daughter-in-law and imposed on him a fine of Rs. 400/-. The fine amount was entrusted to















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top