JUDGMENT

VENKATARAMIAH, J.:— The appellant was working as an Upper Division Clerk in the year 1975. He was placed under suspension by an order dated 25-7-1975 as a result of the institution of a criminal prosecution against him and he continues to remain under suspension till today. By an Order dated 4-8-1975 he was sanctioned subsistence allowance at the rate of 50 per cent of his salary last drawn. By a further order made on 6-5-1982 the subsistence allowance was reduced to 25 per cent of the 987 salary he was drawing on the date of suspension. The increments he would have earned from time to time and the periodical revisions of pay-scales were not taken into consideration in determining the subsistence allowance.

2. The charge-sheet was filed in the criminal case against the appellant in 1976 and the case was committed to the sessions, but the committal proceedings were quashed by the High Court in 1978. Then the proceedings again began before the Metropolitan magistrate in 1978. The case, however, has not yet come to an end.

3. Aggrieved by the denial of the salary and allowances due to him for a long time on account of the order of suspension and in particular the order fixing t