SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 612

K.RAMASWAMY, P.B.SAWANT, RANGANATH MISRA
Paras Nath Mamman Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Subhashini, B.B.Sawhney, KAPIL SIBAL, R.B.MISHRA, R.K.JAIN, R.K.MEHTA, R.P.GUPTA

Judgment

SAWANT, J.:- The petitioners in Writ Petition No. 251 of 1987 are Dairy Mates whereas, those in Writ Petition No. 558 of 1987 are Junior Plant Operatives and Semi-skilled Operatives, all working with the Delhi Milk Scheme. The first petition is on behalf of about one thousand workers, whereas, the second petition is on behalf of about 280 workers.

2. The grievance of the Dairy Mates is that although they perform the duties and functions of semi-skilled workers, they have ,been wrongly classified as unskilled workers and paid salary as such, as recommended by the 4th Pay Commission namely, Rs. 750-940/- instead of Rs. 800-1150/- which is the salary recommended to the semi-skilled workers. The grievance of the Junior Plant Operatives and Semi-Skilled Operatives is that they are actually doing the work of skilled workers, but are classified similarly as unskilled workers and paid salary as such. Both, further, have a grievance that their counterparts in other departments, particularly in Railways, have been properly classified and are paid salary accordingly.

3. The petitions were resisted by the respondent Union of India by filing counter affidavits denying the contentions of t



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top