JUDGMENT

K. RAMASWAMY, J.:- This writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution is a sequel to the order passed by this Court in Sat Dev Parasher, etc. etc. v. State of Haryana in Writ Petition No. 887 of 1986 and a batch of connected Special Leave Petitions, Transfer Petitions, etc. etc. in December, 1985. The State of Haryana made on different dates ad hoc appointments to the posts of Assistant District Attorney. Applications were invited. by the Haryana Public Service Commission to make recruitment to the posts of Assistant District Attorney. The ad hoe appointees filed writ petitions under Article 32 and also special leave petitions against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Their main contention was that they have been regularly recruited though on ad hoe basis after interview by a duly constituted Committee that they were entitled to be regularised. This Count while disposing of the cases held that the petitioners therein were appointed only on ad hoe basis till suitable candidates were available for regular appointment. The interim orders passed on different dates were vacated. It was observed that "if amongst the said petitioners any person has been ap