SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 619

M.FATHIMA BEEVI, K.N.SAIKIA
Municipal Board, Bareilly – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Oil Co. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M. FATHIMA BEEVI, J.:- These two appeals by special leave are filed by the Municipal Board, Bareilly, against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court quashing the Gazette Notification dated August 27, 1969 amending the octroi schedule of the Bareilly Municipality so as to impose octroi on "Mineral oil".

2. The respondents Bharat Oil Company and others filed writ petitions under Art. 226 of the Consitution of India challenging the notification on the ground inter alia that the appellant, the Municipal Board Bareilly (hereinafter referred to as the Board) had no authority to impose octroi on mineral oil in view of the proviso to Rule 131 of the Octroi Rules contained in the U.P. Municipal Account Code, 1925. This was countered by the appellant stating that the R. 131 was superseded by the 1963 Rules which govern the imposition of octroi by the appellant Board. The single Judge in allowing the Writ Petitions took the view that R. 131 restricted the power of the Board to impose the octroi and the subject-matter of the rule is not covered by the 1963 Rules. The appeals preferred were dismissed by the Division Bench of the High Court agreeing that the bar under R. 131 regarding t

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top