SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 596

M.FATHIMA BEEVI, G.L.OZA
Achal Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Ramakrishnareddiar – Respondent


Advocates:
K.M.M.Khan, RAMESH M.KESHVANI, S.Padmanabhan, VEPA P.SARATHI, VINIT KUMAR

JUDGMENT

M. FATHIMA BEEVI, J.:- This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment ,and decree dated the 9th October, 1973 of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Letters Patent Appeal No. 78 of 1969.

2. The appellant was the first defendant in O.S. No. 53 of 1959 in the Munsiffs Court Chingleput: The respondents are the legal representatives of Munishbba Reddi, the plaintiff therein. That suit was instituted on 11-2-1959 for recovery of possession of the suit property with mesne profits. The suit was decreed by the trial Court on 7-11-1960. The first. appellate Court by the revised judgment dated the 5th August, 1961 in A.S. No. 21 of 1961 reversed the decree. The second appeal preferred by the plaintiff was dismissed by the High Court in S.A. No. 426 of 1965 on 31-1-1969. However, the Division Bench of the High Court allowed the Letters Patent Appeal filed by the plaintiff.

3. It is necessary to set out few facts for the purpose of this appeal. The suit property having an extent of 13 acres and 42-1/2 cents originally belonged to one Dasu Reddi. The conveyed possession of the land to one Varada Reddi under an oral agreement of sale on 10-7-1946. A deed of sale was drawn up











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top