SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 11

K.RAMASWAMY, P.B.SAWANT, RANGANATH MISRA
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
K. T. Shastri – Respondent


Advocates:
A.D.SINGH, A.SUBBA RAO, C.V.SUBBA RAO, K.T.Shastri, P.P.Rao

JUDGMENT

SAWANT, J. :- The appellants, Union of India and the Director, Technical Development and Production (Air), Ministry of Defence, have preferred this appeal against the decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, holding that respondent K.T. Shastry was entitled to remain in service up to the superannuation age of 60 years and was not liable to be retired at the alleged superannuation age of 58 years.

2. The relevant admitted facts are that the respondent was recruited as a Senior Scientific Officer on October 12, 1966 in the Defence Science Service. He was posted in the Directorate of Technical Development and Production (Air), briefly called DTD & P. At the relevant time the Defence Science Service had three units under it, namely, (1) Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), 2) Directorate-General of Inspection (DGI) and (3) Directorate of Technical Development and Production (Air) (DTD & P).

The recruitment when made was always to the Defence Science Service, and after the recruitment, the recruits were posted according to the exigency of the service, in any of the said three units. Their services were interchangeable and inter-transferabl









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top