SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 33

KULDIP SINGH, M.H.KANIA
Jainendrakumar Vijaykljmar Badjato – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

 Leave granted. Counsel heard.

2. We find that Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 1986 has been decided without the learned councel of the appellant (accused ) who was appointed by the Court not being present. We do not wish to enter into the question as to why the councel was not present. That is a matter which can be considered by appropriate authorities, if they thing fit. In the circumstances, however, we set aside the judgement of the High Court and direct that the Criminal Appeal No.25 of 1986 shall be heard afresh by the High Court. The appellant states that he will engage his own counsel at his own costs.

3. The appeal is allowed as aforesaid with no order as to costs.

Appeal allowed.

For Citation : AIR 1990 SC 1224

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top