SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 196

A.M.AHMADI, M.FATHIMA BEEVI
Anvaruddin – Appellant
Versus
Shakoor – Respondent


Advocates:
D.K.GARG, DALVIR BHANDARI, PRASHANT CHAUDHARY, Prithvi Raj, R.K.GARG, SHOBHA DIXIT

Judgment

AHMADI, J.:- These four appeals, the first by a relative Anvaruddin and the others by the State of U.P., arise out of a single incident which occurred on February 11, 1973 at about 11 a.m. wherein Siraju and his son Ali Mohammad were killed. Nine persons, namely, (i)Shakoor, (ii)Fayaz Ahmad, (iii)Ahsan, (iv)Allauddin, (v)Shamshu, (vi) Alam, (vii) Wasla, (viii) Gaju and (ix) Kallu were arraigned. before the learned Sessions Judge, Meerut, principally on the charge of having formed an unlawful assembly for the murder of the aforesaid two persons. They were charged under Ss. 147 and 302 read with S. 149, I.P.C. The learned Sessions Judge acquitted two of them, namely, Gaju and Kallu. of all the charges levelled against them and directed that they be set at liberty whereas the remaining seven persons were convicted under S. 3021149, I.P.C. and were sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life. Accused Shakoor, Alam, Fayaz Ahmad, Ahsan, Allauddin and Wasla were also convicted. under S. 148, I. P. C. and were sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently. Accused Shamshu was convicted under S. 147 and was directed to suf
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top