1990 Supreme(SC) 354
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RANGANATH MISRA AND KULDIP SINGH, JJ.
Dr. Damodar Panda, etc., Petitioners
Versus
State of Orissa, etc., Respondents.
Writ Petn. No.511 of 1988 with Writ Petn. (Civil) No.975 of 1988, D/- 16-7-1990.
A.K.PANDEY, A.Subhashini, C.K.Suchitra, K.V.SRI KUMAR, V.C.MAHAJAN
Officers of the originating State must be permitted to hold appropriate inquiries within the recipient State for enforcing the statute, and no recipient State shall place any hindrance in such process.
Headnote:
Interstate Migrant - Enforcement of Section 20(3) of the Interstate Migrant, Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Condition of Service) Act, 1979 - The court held that officers of the originating State must be permitted to hold appropriate inquiries within the recipient State for enforcing the statute, and no recipient State shall place any hindrance in such process.
Fact of the Case:
The court considered the enforcement of Section 20(3) of the Interstate Migrant, Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Condition of Service) Act, 1979, particularly regarding the ability of officers of the originating State to make inquiries within the recipient State.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that every State and Union Territory in India would be obliged to permit officers of originating States of migrant labor for holding appropriate inquiries within the limits of the recipient States for enforcement of the statute, and no recipient State shall place any embargo or hindrance in such process.
Issues: Enforcement of Section 20(3) of the Interstate Migrant, Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Condition of Service) Act, 1979.
Ratio Decidendi: Officers of the originating State must be permitted to hold appropriate inquiries within the recipient State for enforcing the statute, and no recipient State shall place any hindrance in such process.
Final Decision: The court directed every State and Union Territory in India to comply with the enforcement of Section 20(3) of the Act, and no recipient State shall place any hindrance in such process. The writ petitions were disposed of with this order.
JUDGMENT
One of the matters which arises for consideration in this Writ Petition is as to how the provisions of the Interstate Migrant, Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Condition of Service) Act, 1979, and particularly of section 20 thereof can be enforced. In the affidavit filed by the Union of India in the Ministry of Labour it has been stated that in view of the scheme contained in Section 20(3) of the Act that officer of the originating State can make enquiries within the recipient State provided the recipient State agrees to such officers of the originating State operating within that State, the law has not become workable in a Proper way. This is a beneficial legislation for satisfying the provisions of the Constitution and the obligation in international agreements to which India is a party. We do not think there can be any valid justification for not permitting the officers of the originating State to hold appropriate enquiries in the recipient State in regard to persons of the originating State working as migrant labour in the recipient State. We do not think that there is any necessity to hear the other States before making an order for enforcing Section 20(3) and to give effect to the legislative intention contained therein.
2. Mr. Panda appearing for the State of Orissa has agreed that Orissa State has no objection to officers of any originating State holding necessary enquiries within Orissa when it is a recipient State. We would, therefore, make a direction that to implement the provisions of the Act of 1979 referred to above every State and Union Territory in India would be obliged to permit Officers of originating States of migrant labour for holding appropriate inquiries within the limits of the recipient States for enforcement of the statute and no recipient State shall place any embargo or hindrance in such process. Copy of this order shall be sent to the Chief Secretary of every State and Union Territory for compliance.
3. We are cognizant of the fact that this order has been made without hearing the States other than Orissa and the Union Territories. In the event of any State or Union Territory is of the opinion that the direction should be modified, liberty is given to apply for modification of the order but until it is modified it shall remain in force. The writ petitions are disposed of with this order. No costs.
Order accordingly.
For Citation : AIR 1990 SC 1901