SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 394

N.D.OJHA, S.C.AGRAWAL
Suresh Mohan Chopra – Appellant
Versus
Lakhi Prabhu Dayal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT:- Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Special leave granted. The appeal is taken up for final bearing with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.

3. The appellant filed a claim for compensation on account of injuries received by him in an accident which took place on 30th November, 1977. On that date, the appellant was going on his scooter which met with an accident with a motor-cycle which was being driven by respondent No. 1 and was owned by respondent No. 2. The Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 30,000/- as compensation to the appellant against respondents Nos. 1 and 2, namely, the driver and owner of the motor-cycle as also against the New India Assurance Company Limited respondent No. 3 with whom according to the appellant the motor-cycle stood insured at the time of the accident.

4. Aggrieved by the award of the Tribunal, the Insurance Company preferred an appeal before the High Court which was allowed and the award as against the Insurance Company has been set aside. The High Court has taken the view that it had not been established that respondent No. 1 had a driving licence at the time of the accident and consequently the Insurance Company could no





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top