SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 383

R.M.SAHAI, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
B. N. Saxena – Appellant
Versus
New Delhi Municipal Committee – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHA JAIN MADAN, R.K.MAHESHWARI, RAJINDER SACHAR, SANJIV MADAN

Judgment

K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.:- Special leave granted.

2. The petitioner who was originally a Junior Draftsman and subsequently re-designated as Senior Draftsman is claiming promotion as Head Draftsman in the New Delhi Municipal Committee (NDMC). The Delhi High Court by the judgment under appeal has rejected his claim.

3. Prior to February, 1973, the qualifications prescribed for the post of Head Draftsman was Matric with Diploma/ Certificate in Draftsmanship from a recognised institution with three years experience in preparing engineering drawings in an electric supply undertaking or an Engineering Manufacturing Organisation. The qualifications for the post of Junior Draftsman were, however, not prescribed. The petitioner was appointed as Junior Draftsman without any Diploma/ Certificate.

4. For the first time, the NDMC by a policy decision dated February 2, 1973 redesignated Junior Draftsmen in the scale of Rs. 110-200 as Senior Draftsmen in the scale of Rs. 150-240. The Resolution, in effect, validated the recruitment of the petitioner and others similarly situated.

5. By the same Resolution, the NDMC has revised the qualifications for the post of Head Draftsman as under:

"Head D








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top