SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 360

T.K.THOMMEN, V.RAMASWAMI
Hissar Improvement Trust – Appellant
Versus
Rukmani Devi – Respondent


Judgment

 This appeal by the Improvement Trust (the second respondent in the proceedings in the High Court) is against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court upholding the respondent-landowners claim to interest which the High Court directed the Executing Court to determine. The proceedings in the High Court arose in a Revision Petition filed by the landowner against the order of the Executing Court disallowing her claim to interest, It must be noticed that before the Executing Court, the State of Haryana was the sole respondent. It was only in the High Court proceedings that the present appellant-the Trust was impleaded as a second respondent.

2. Counsel for the appellant submits that whatever amount was payable under the Award had been deposited by the appellant with the Collector for payment of compensation. The deposit had been made prior to the taking of possession under the Award. However, the High Court has now found, counsel submits, that the appellant is jointly and severally liable to pay, the interest to the landowner.

3. Section 31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 provides for payment of compensation or deposit of the same in Court. The section requires that th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top