SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 447

`SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
N.M. KASLIWAL AND S.C. AGRAWAL, JJ.
Karnani Properties Ltd., Appellant
Versus
State of W.B. and others, Respondents
Appeal No. 2080(L) of 1977, D/- 22-8-1990.

Advocates:
G.S.CHATTERJEE, M.Qamaruddin, R.N.NATH, RATHIN DAS, S.P.KHERA

Headnote:Industrial Disputes Act, 1947-Section 2(j)-industry-Company incorporated under the Companies Act and owner of mansions letting out flats therein and employing workers such as plumbers, electricians, lift men, sweepers etc. for rendering service to the occupants and maintenance of such flats-the activity carried on by the appellant company falls within the ambit of the expression "industry". 1978 (3) SCR 207-Relied Upon; 1953 SCR 302, 1960 (2) SCR 866, 1960 (2) SCR 942-Referred ; 1971 (1) SCR 177-Noticed. (Para 9)

       Industrial Disputes Act, 1947-Sections 19 and 2(p)-termination of an award in the nature of a settlement under section 2(p)-it is not the requirement of section 19(2) that there should be a formal notice terminating a settlement - notice can be inferred from the correspondence between the parties-a letter addressed to the Labour Commissioner with copy to the employer with a clear intimation of the intention of the employees to terminate the award and the employer being aware of such intention of the union satisfies the requirement of section 19.1972 (1) SCR 790-Followed. (Para 11)

       Constitution of India-Article 133(1) (a) - issue raised for the first time before the Supreme Court-issue involving enquiry into question of fact-cannot be permitted to be agitated. (Para 12)

       Constitution of India-Article 226-while considering the finding of the Tribunal the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 should generally consider the materials available to the Tribunal-fresh and further materials which were no available before the Tribunal should not be allowed to be placed. (Para 18)

Judgment

S. C. AGRAWAL, J.:- This appeal, by certificate granted under Art. 133(1)(a) of the Constitution, is directed against judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta dated December 20, 1974, in Appeal No. 104 of 1972: (Reported in 1975 (2) Cal LJ 5).

2. Karnani Properties Ltd., appellant herein, is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913. It owns several mansion houses known as Karnani Mansions at Park Street, Calcutta. There are about 300 flats in these mansions which have been let out to tenants. The appellant provides various facilities to its tenants in these flats, e.g. free supply of electricity, washing and cleaning of floors and lavatories, lift service, electric repairs and replacing, sanitary repairs and replacing, etc., and for that purpose the appellant employs over 50 persons, namely sweepers, plumbers, malis, lift-man, durwans, pumpmen, electric and other mistries, bill collectors and bearers, etc., in connection with these properties. A dispute arose between the employees of the appellant represented by Barabazar Zamandar Sangh (hereinafter referred to as the union) and the appellant with regard to wages, scales of pay, dearness allowance and gratuity. The Government of West Bengal, by order dated July 29, 1967, referred for adjudication to the 6th Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal, the industrial dispute relating to:

(a) Fixation of Grades and Scales of pay of the different categories of workmen;

(b) Dearness Allowance; and

(c) Gratuity.

3. The appellant raised preliminary objections with regard to the validity of the reference before the Industrial Tribunal on the ground that the alleged dispute is not an industrial dispute and that the reference is barred by Section 19 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the reason that in 1960 there was an Award on the basis of settlement made With the union, and the said Award has not been terminated by either of the parties and is still binding on the parties. The Industrial Tribunal, by its order dated August 24, 1968 overruled the said preliminary objections raised by the appellant and thereafter the Tribunal gave the Award dated March 3, 1969. The Industrial Tribunal expressed its inability to fix any grades and scales of pay of the workmen for the reason that the evidence adduced by the union -on this issue was scrappy, none too convincing and not very much acceptable. As regards dearness allowance the Industrial Tribunal held that since November, 1964 the price index of working class in Calcutta has considerably gone up from 460 to 750 points (as was in October, 1968), i.e. roughly by 300 points. The Industrial Tribunal awarded enhanced DA at the rate of Rs. 60/- per month (Rs. 20/- per 100 points) to the sweeper, bearer, helper, mali, mazdoor, lift-man, head sweeper, durwan, pumpman, and assistant electric mistry. DA at the rate of Rs. 54/- per month (Rs. 18/- per 100 points) was awarded to the plumber, raj mistry, head durwan, electric mistry and driver and bill collector. It was also directed that the said rates of DA would remain in force as long as the price index will remain between 600 to 800 points and if the price index goes up beyond 800 points the rate of DA will be revised according to the rates mentioned and if it goes below 600 points it also may be revised accordingly. With regard to gratuity the Industrial Tribunal pointed out that under the existing scheme gratuity is payable to every workman after completion of three years continued, faithful and satisfactory service at the rate of 10 days consolidated salary for every completed year of service since the date of appointment. The Industrial Tribunal held that three- years period was too short to make a workman entitled to gratuity and that "satisfactory" and "faithful" are vague terms. The Industrial Tribunal framed a scheme of gratuity whereunder after completion of six years of continuous service with the appellant every workma



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top