Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.C. RAY, S.R. PANDIAN AND R.M. SAHAI, JJ.
Dr. (Mrs.) Leena Roy, Petitioner
Versus
Dr. Subrato Roy and others, Respondents. 93
Writ Petn. (Criminal) No. 846 of 1990 (with Cri. M. P. Nos. 2876, 4145 of 1990, Spl. Leave Petn. No. 10065 and I. A. No. 3 of 1990)
Decided on 26-10-1990.
ORDER:—We have considered the entire matter. The parties are present before us and have filed an application for compromise and also for an order for decree of divorce by mitual consent. Since we are not in seisin of the matter it is better to direct the parties to file the application before the City Civil and Sessions Court, Calcutta. If such an application is filed, the Court will dispose of the application as expeditiously as possible Preferably within two weeks from the date of filing of such application, in view of the fact that one of the parties intends to go back to America in connection with her service. Regarding the custody of the child in view of the compromise being effected between the parties we direet the writ, applications and the special leave petition to be disposed of in terms of the compromise. There will be no order as to costs.
Order accordingly.
For citation: AIR 1991 SC 92= (1990) 4 JT 176 = (1991) I SCC 63.
Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
