SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 630

B.C.RAY, S.R.PANDIAN, R.M.SAHAI
Leena Roy – Appellant
Versus
Subrato Roy – Respondent


ORDER:—We have considered the entire matter. The parties are present before us and have filed an application for compromise and also for an order for decree of divorce by mitual consent. Since we are not in seisin of the matter it is better to direct the parties to file the application before the City Civil and Sessions Court, Calcutta. If such an application is filed, the Court will dispose of the application as expeditiously as possible Preferably within two weeks from the date of filing of such application, in view of the fact that one of the parties intends to go back to America in connection with her service. Regarding the custody of the child in view of the compromise being effected between the parties we direet the writ, applications and the special leave petition to be disposed of in terms of the compromise. There will be no order as to costs.

Order accordingly.


For citation: AIR 1991 SC 92= (1990) 4 JT 176 = (1991) I SCC 63.

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top