SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 494

K.N.SINGH, KULDIP SINGH, T.K.THOMMEN
Hyderabad Commercials – Appellant
Versus
Indian Bank – Respondent


ORDER:— Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissing the appellants Writ Petition on the ground that it involved disputed questions of facts which could be determined by the Civil Court in a suit. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and having perused the material on record we find that the case does not involve any disputed questions of facts instead on admitted facts the appellant is entitled to relief.

3. The appellant is the Sub-Distributors of M/ s. Unimech Appliances, it has a Current Account No. 525 with the Indian Bank, Barkatpura Branch, Hyderabad. The appellant had been depositing money through cheques in its Current Account from time to time. During the period 15-1-87 to 13-5-87 the appellant had deposited cheques in the Indian Bank, the amounts under those were realised by the Bank and credited to the a appellants account but later on a sum of Rs. 12.95 lacs was transferred to the account of the respondent- M/ s. Unimech Appliances. The appellant protested the transfer of the aforesaid amount on the ground that it had never authorised the Bank for transferring the amount to respondents ac


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top