SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 660

K.N.SAIKIA, R.M.SAHAI, T.K.THOMMEN
P. U. Abdul Rahiman – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT:— Special leave granted.

2. This appeal arises from the judgment of the Delhi High Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 525 of 1989 (reported in 1990 Cri LJ NOC 139) dismissing the appellants writ petition challenging the order of his detention dated 13-2-1989 made under S. 3(1) and declaration dated 17-4-1989 made under S. 10(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Pychotropic Substances Act, 1988. The appellant contends that certain important documents relied upon by the detaining authority had not been supplied to him.

3. The appellant had filed a Review Petition against the aforesaid judgment which was numbered as Cri. Misc. Petition No. 68 of 1990, but the same was also dismissed.

4. The appellant had been arrested on 4-6-1988 under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. On 9-6-1988 he had moved an application before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kasargod for ball. That application was rejected. On 10-6-1988 the appellant moved an application for bail, as C.M.P. No. 104/88, before the District and Sessions Judge, Kasargod. On 17-6-1988 the appellant was released on bail subject to certain conditions. In the two applications












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top