SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 407

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KULDIP SINGH AND M. FATHIMA BEEVI, JJ.
Smt. Tara Devi, Appellant
Versus
State of U.P., Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 212 of 1979
Decided on 6-8-1990.

Advocates:
Laxmi Arvind Mathur, MANOJ SVARUP, PRASHANT CHAUDHARY

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 – Criminal Trial – Offence of Murder – Circumstantial evidence - Appeal against conviction - Deceased possessed about 30-40 bighas of land whereas Hari had only 6 bighas with him. Hari had a grouse that deceased had illegally occupied part of the family land which according to him was his share. Hari was thus claiming his share in the land from deceased - First wife of deceased had died issueless and he had taken Tara Devi as his second wife about 12-13 years before the occurrence - Appeallant gave birth to four daughters aged 12, 5, 3 and one and a half years respectively - On date of occurrence eldest daughter had gone to her maternal grandfathers house. Haris wife died 6 or 7 years before occurrence and he did not remarry - Held, There is no direct evidence to connect appellant with crime - Prosecution ,relied on circumstantial evidence to prove charge against her - Court do not agree with the reasoning of High Court - Regarding dead body in the house, she has stated that after the murder Hari left house saying that he would bring some more persons to take away the body - Being a woman she must have been terrified and by doing what she was asked to do by Hari - Regarding stand taken by appellant court find no inconsistency in same - There is no doubt that appellant was in complicity with Hari but fact remains that main accused who committed crime was Hari.nature of injuries on the person of deceased were such which could not have ordinarily been inflicted by frail hands of a woman - Main accused having been acquitted, there is no justification to maintain the conviction and sentence of the appellant - Appeal allowed.

JUDGMENT

KULDIP SINGH, J.:— Tara Devi and her lover Hari were tried for the murder of Shivanand husband of Tara Devi. The trial Court gave benefit of doubt to Hari and acquitted him. Tara Devi was, however, convicted under Section 302, IPC and was sentenced to life imprisonment. The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by Tara Devi and maintained the conviction and sentences. This is Tara Devis appeal against the judgment of the High Court.

2. The prosecution story, briefly, is that Shivanand deceased was the cousin of Hari. They were living in adjoining houses. Shivanand possessed about 30-40 bighas of land whereas Hari had only 6 bighas with him. Hari had a grouse that Shivanand had illegally occupied part of the family land which according to him was his share. Hari was thus claiming his share in the land from Shivanand. The first wife of Shivanand had died issueless and he had taken Tara Devi as his second wife about 12-13 years before the occurrence. Tara Devi gave birth to four daughters aged 12, 5, 3 and one and a half years respectively. On the date of occurrence the eldest daughter had gone to her maternal grandfathers house. Haris wife died 6 or 7 years before the occurrence and he did not remarry. Hari developed illicit connection with Tara Devi which was resented by Shivanand and he restrained her from meeting Hari. Tara Devi did not listen to her husband and as such they used to quarrel quite often. Getting disgusted with his wifes conduct Shivanand thought of disposing of his property and leaving the village. That further aggravated the differences between the two as Tara Devi apprehended that if the property was sold she along with her children would starve.

3. The prosecution case further is that on the night between 22/23 December, 1971 Tara Devi and Hari in furtherance of their common intention hacked Shivanand to death with Gandassa while he was asleep. The dead body was kept in the house for two days. Tara Devi closed the house from inside and stayed there with her three small daughters. On December 24,1971 Ram Saran, who was living in front of Shivanands house became suspicious as he had not seen Shivanand for two days. He went to Garib Das chowkidar and told him that the doors of Shivanand were suspiciously closed for the last two days. Garib Das accompanied by Kotwal Singh, Dashrath Singh Ujagar Singh; Balwant Sri Ram and others went to the house of Shivanand. Initially Tara Devi did not open the door but ultimately they got the door opened and found Tara Devi trembling with fear. The villagers found the dead body of Shivanand lying in the house in a pool of blood with incised wounds on his head, temple and neck. On inquiry as to the cause of Shivanands death she at first kept quiet but when Garib Das told her that in case she gave the correct facts she would not be harmed, she came out with the confession that her husband used to beat her and wanted to leave the village. She along with Hari committed the murder of Shivanand between 22 / 23 January, 1971. She also stated that the murder was committed by inflicting injuries with a Gandassa and as Hari alone was unable to lift the dead body he went away to call persons for this purpose.

4. The post-mortem examination on the dead body of Shivanand revealed four incised injuries on the neck and temple. Large blood vessels were found cut. The frontal parietal and temporal bones were also cut. The head was found badly lacerated and the fourth cerebral vertebra was also cut.

5. Both the accused denied the charges and stated that they were falsely implicated. Tara Devi stated that there was dispute between Shivanand and Hari over property. Hari got annoyed and threatened to kill Shivanand. During the night of the occurrence she was sleeping inside her kotha when she heard hue and cry. She went out and saw Hari along with his maternal uncles wife coming out of the room where her husband was sleeping. They pointed towards her the Gandasa by which they had committed t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top