None of the cases explicitly state that they have been overruled, reversed, or explicitly criticized as bad law. However, some entries mention that certain views or decisions have been set aside or distinguished, which may imply prior decisions were questioned or overruled, but these are not definitive statements of bad law. For example:

ANIL KUMAR GANDHI VS N. C. B. - 1991 0 Supreme(Del) 344: "This view of the Delhi High Court was set aside by the Supreme Court in the case of Narcotics Control Bureau v. ... Kishan Lal and others, 1991 Crl. L. J. 654." — indicates that a prior view was overruled or set aside.

Ram Sarup Alias Sarup Chand VS State Of Haryana - 1992 0 Supreme(P&H) 492: "Kishan Lal, AIR 1991 SC 558 ... lay down a correct law and, therefore, the same cannot be relied upon, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in Narcotic Control" — suggests that the earlier law in Kishan Lal was superseded or questioned.

Several references to "Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kishan Lal, AIR 1991 SC 558" are repeated, often as a point of reference, but not as overruled decisions.

Overall, there is no explicit indication that any case law in the list has been overruled or reversed outright. Some references imply that decisions like Kishan Lal (AIR 1991 SC 558) are considered good law, while others note that certain views have been distinguished or set aside, but without clear overruled declarations.