SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 199

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, S.R.PANDIAN
Narendra Pratap Narain Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT


S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, J.:— These two criminal appeals are preferred by the appellants, namely - Narendra Pratap Narain Singh and Puran Singh who were arrayed as accused Nos. 1 and 2 before the trial Court, against the judgments dated 8-5-1979 rendered in Criminal Appeals Nos. 158 and 157 of 1977 on the file of Allahabad High Court, Lucknow arising out of Sessions trials Nos. A-2 1 0 and 228 of 1974 whereby the High Court by a common judgment and order set aside the convictions and sentence under Ss. 467 and 471, I. P. C. but, however, upheld their conviction under S. 409, I.P.C. and reduced the substantive sentence of imprisonment to the period already undergone and the sentence of fine from Rs. 500 to Rs. 250 and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months in each of the cases.

2. The material facts as unfolded from the records can be stated thus:

There was a Block Development Office in the district of Sultanpur known as Dhanpatganj Block to which a seed store known as Semrauna seed store was attached. The seed store was to cater to the needs and requirements of the cultivators for seeds and fertilisers etc. During 1964-65, the first appellant was in charge of

















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top