SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. AHMADI, V. RAMASWAMI AND K. RAMASWAMY, JJ.
T.N. Goda Varman Thirumulpad and others, Appellants
Versus
State of Kerala and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 1780-81 of 1991, (in S.L.Ps. Nos. 4829-4829A, 5500 and 7905 of 1988)
Decided on 4-4-1991.
Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 82 - Principal Act - Section 3 – Notification - Suit for partition - Management of property - Private forest - Registered document of title – Validity of - In that suit a preliminary decree for partition was passed and Joint Receivers were appointed by Court for the management of property till partition by metes and bounds was effected - However, before a final decree could be passed in said suit Act, 1971 came into force with effect from 10th May, 1971 - Under S. 3(1) thereof, ownership and possession of all private forests in State of Kerala stood transferred to and vested in Government free of all encumbrances with effect on and from appointed day i.e. 10th May, 1971 - This provision being subject to sub-secs. (2) and (3) thereof must be read conjointly with those sub-sections - Sub-sec. (2) carves out an exemption in respect of so much extent of land comprised in private forest held by an owner under his personal cultivation as is within ceiling limit applicable to him under Act, 1963 or any building or structure standing there on and pertaining thereto - Explanation to that subsection states that expression cultivation shall include cultivation of tree or plants of any species - Held, It is needless to clarify that total area allocable will in no case exceed 1680 acres but on account of applicants having any other land or opting for any other land there may be shrinkage in total area claimed - Benefit of shrinkage if any will go to State Government - We may also clarify that area to be allocated will be on right bank of Shaliyar River in one single block - High Court also upheld validity of S. 5 where under notification was issued - In view of our aforesaid decision Kovilakam members will now be entitled to make a claim under S. 3(3) of Act - After claims are finalised by Custodian, if they still feel aggrieved by impugned notification it would be open to them to approach High Court for appropriate relief - We need not interfere with order passed by High Court in a different fact situation - We would make it clear that our refusal to interfere will not preclude members of Kovilakam, after they become entitled to land under S. 3(3) of Act, to challenge notification or any action taken pursuant to notification – Appeal disposed of.
JUDGMENT:— Special leave granted.
2. Heard counsel for both sides. We have perused, the relevant orders and documents germane to the disposal of these appeals .
3. The facts reveal that a Suit No. O.S. 22/61 was filed in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode, for partition and separate possession of about 32,000 acres of Private Forest Lands belonging to the Nilampur Kovilakam comprising 112 members. In that suit a preliminary decree for partition was passed and Joint Receivers were appointed by the Court for the management of the property till partition by metes and bounds was effected. However, before a final decree could be passed in the said suit the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 came into force with effect from 10th May, 1971. Under S. 3(1) thereof, the ownership and possession of all private forests in the State of Kerala stood transferred to and vested in the Government free of all encumbrances with effect on and from the appointed day i.e. 10th May, 1971. This provision being subject to sub-secs. (2) and (3) thereof must be read conjointly with those sub-sections. Sub-sec. (2) carves out an exemption in respect of so much extent of land comprised in private forest held by an owner under his personal cultivation as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 or any building or structure standing there on and pertaining thereto. The explanation to that subsection states that the expression cultivation shall include cultivation of tree or plants of any species. Then comes sub-sec. (3) which reads as under:
"(3). Nothing contained in sub-section(l) shall apply in respect of so much extent of private forests held by an owner under a valid registered document of title executed before the appointed day and intended for cultivation by him, which together with other lands held by him to which Chapter III of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, is applicable, does not exceed the extent of the ceiling area applicable to him under S. 82 of the said Act. "
The demarcation of the boundries has to be done by the custodian by virtue of S. 6. S. 7 contemplates the Constitution of one or more than one Tribunals for the purposes of the Act. Section 8 deals with settlement of disputes. It provides that where any dispute arises as to whether any private forest or portion thereof has vested in the Government or not, the person who claims that the land is not a private forest or that the private forest has not vested in the Government may within such period as may be prescribed apply to the Tribunal for decision of the dispute. S. 13 bars the jurisdiction of Civil Gourts. It says that no Civil Court shall have jurisdiction to decide or deal with any question or to determine any matter which is, by or under this Act, required to be decided or dealt with or to be determined by the Tribunal, the Custodian or any other officer except as otherwise provided by the Act. It will, however, be seen that an exclusive jurisdiction has been conferred on the authorities created under the Act. It is not necessary for us to determine what is the scope and ambit of the expression except as otherwise provided in this Act used in S. 13 of the Act. The power to make rules is conferred by S. 17. In exercise of the said power the State Government has made rules entitled the Kerala Private Forest (Exemption from Vesting) Rules, 1974. These rules have come into force w.e.f. 23rd April, 1974. Rule 3 thereof refers to S. 3 of the Principal Act. It provides that where any other claims exemption in respect of any land held by him from the provisions of sub-sec. (1) of S. 3, on the ground that (a) such land is under his personal cultivation and is within the ceiling limit or (b) such land is held under a valid document of title executed before 10th May, 1971 and is intended for cultivation by him which together with other lands held by him to which Chapter III of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.