SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 182

N.D.OJHA, S.RANGANATHAN, M.FATHIMA BEEVI
Piara Singh – Appellant
Versus
Natha Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT


ORDER:— Having heard both counsel, we are of the opinion that this appeal has to be dismissed.

2. A preliminary objection has been raised that all the three appellants who originally filed the appeal have died and that the appeal has abated. We, however, find that in respect of one of the appellants the legal representatives were already on record and in respect of another appellant the legal representatives were duly brought on record. Only after the death of Piara Singh, one of the appellants, no immediate steps were taken to bring the legal representatives on record. Piara Singh died in June, 1990. A belated application has been filed before us, dated 7-3-91, seeking permission to bring on record his legal representatives. This application is opposed by the respondents pointing out that this application has been filed immediately after the respondents filed an application on 7-3-91 praying that the appeal should be dismissed on the ground of abatement. We have looked into the application for substitution and having regard to the fact that no counter-affidavit has yet been filed and as the parties are agriculturists and diligent steps were taken in respect of the earlier






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top