SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 182

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. RANGANATHAN, M. FATHIMA BEEVI AND N.D. OJHA, JJ.
Piara Singh and others, Appellants

Versus

Natha Singh and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 79 of 1983

Decided on 22-3-1991.

Headnote:ABATEMENT OF APPEAL—DELAY IN BRINGING LEGAL HEIRS ON RECORD—APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY AS ALL THREE APPELLANTS DIED

       -as in the case of Pira Singh v. Natha Singh, AIR 1991 SC 1529 in respect of one of the appellants the legal representative were duly brought on record. Only in case of one of the appellants, no immediate steps were taken to bring the legal representatives on record. A belated application was filed to bring his legal representatives on record, which was opposed by the respondent pointing out that the application was filed immediately after the respondents filed an application praying that the appeal should be dismissed on the ground of abatement. As the parties are agriculturists and diligent steps were taken in respect of the earlier deaths, the delay was condoned and the petition to bring the legal representatives of the deceased on record was allowed.

JUDGMENT


ORDER:— Having heard both counsel, we are of the opinion that this appeal has to be dismissed.

2. A preliminary objection has been raised that all the three appellants who originally filed the appeal have died and that the appeal has abated. We, however, find that in respect of one of the appellants the legal representatives were already on record and in respect of another appellant the legal representatives were duly brought on record. Only after the death of Piara Singh, one of the appellants, no immediate steps were taken to bring the legal representatives on record. Piara Singh died in June, 1990. A belated application has been filed before us, dated 7-3-91, seeking permission to bring on record his legal representatives. This application is opposed by the respondents pointing out that this application has been filed immediately after the respondents filed an application on 7-3-91 praying that the appeal should be dismissed on the ground of abatement. We have looked into the application for substitution and having regard to the fact that no counter-affidavit has yet been filed and as the parties are agriculturists and diligent steps were taken in respect of the earlier deaths, we think we should condone the delay and bring on record the legal representatives of Pliara Singh as prayed for. I. A. No......... / 91 is accordingly allowed. In place of Piara Singh, Daljit Kaur, Angrez Singh, Ajit Singh and Dalbir Singh may be brought on record as prayed for.

3. However, we find that on the merits there is no ground to interfere with the decision of the High Court. The short question before the High Court was whether the will executed by Sadhu Singh in 1962 was genuine or not. Both the first appellate court and the High Court have concurrently held that the will was genuine. This is purely a finding of fact with which we cannot and do not interfere under Art. 136 of the Constitution. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

4. No order as to costs.

Appeal dismissed.


For Citation : AIR 1991 SC 1529

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top