SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 220

K.RAMASWAMY, N.M.KASLIWAL
Weney D Souze – Appellant
Versus
G. A. Conceicao – Respondent


Advocates:
N.N.JOHARI, R.SASIPRABHU, S.A.SHROFF, U.N.BACHHAVAT, Uma Nath Singh

JUDGMENT

KASLIWAL, J.:— This appeal by special leave has been filed by the defendant in a suit for possession against judgment of Division Bench of the Bombay High Court dated 16th July, 1976.

2. A non-agricultural plot of land admeasuring 1200 sq. yards situated in village Malad belonged to D. B. Conceicao (since deceased). Plaintiffs Nos. 1 to 4 being the brothers and plaintiff No. 5 widow of D. B. Conceicao filed a suit on 28th March, 1959 in the City Civil Court, Bombay for possession of the suit land against the present appellant. D. B. Conceicao had died on March 3, 1959 before filing of the above suit. The suit was brought on the ground that the defendant No. 1 (appellant) had entered into possession of the suit land under a writing of October 3, 1953. In the said letter it was stated that the suit land admeasuring about 1200 sq. yards had been given on a ten years lease. The defendant had to pay annually Rs. 240/-. It was alleged that the said lease was required to be registered compulsorily and in the absence of such registration the lease was void and the defendants were trespassers. It was also alleged in the plaint that the defendant No. 1 did not pay any amount except a


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top