JUDGMENT

Special leave granted. The respondent, though served with dasti notice even on 12-2-9 1, neither is he present in Court nor is he appearing through any counsel. Hence, we heard the learned counsel for the appellants at length, perused the documents carefully as well as the impugned observations made by the learned Judges and the affidavit filed by the appellant No.2, namely, K. P. Raghyuvanshi, who was then the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone 3, Kalyan, District Thane, Maharashtra State The prayer in this appeal is for expunction of the following remarks made by the learned Judges in their order dated. 15-7-1988:

"In these circumstances we are constrained to inform the State Government that power to pass orders under the Bombay Police Act should be withdrawn from Raghuvanshi and this order should be communicated to Shri Raghuvanshi wherever he is posted."

2. In this context, we would like to point out that on an earlier occasion the appellants came before this Court for expunction of the same remarks but this Court passed the following order:

"We are of the opinion that instead of coming to this Court, the petitioner should have gone to the High Court for the review of th