SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 275

A.M.AHMADI, K.RAMASWAMY, V.RAMASWAMI
Nand Kishore Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Delay condoned.

2. Special leave granted.

3. The Full Bench of the Orissa High Court in Rama Chandra Das v. State of Orissa (1988) 65 Cut LT 253 (1988 Lab IC 1478) on an interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Orissa Education Act, 1969 read with the relevant rules made thereunder came to the conclusion that the fixing of the date of superannuation of some teachers at 58 years and others at 60 years was violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution. It, therefore, concluded as under:

"Hence, the teachers whose age of superannuation according to the instructions read with the 1981 Rules was 58 are entitled to have a declaration that they would continue till they attained the age of 60 years unless the tenure was cut-short by the coming into force of the 1986 Rules which fixed the age of superannuation at 58 years and so declare. Therefore, it follows that the teachers who completed 60 years of age prior to 15-3-1986 were to retire on attaining 60 years of age and those who did not complete 60 years of age but had completed 58 years of age when the rules came into force, would retire on 15-3-1986. Some of the petitioner-teachers even though they had completed 58 years of ag







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top