SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 415

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KULDIP SINGH AND K. RAMASWAMY, JJ.
State of Sikkim, Appellant

Versus

Dorjee Tshering Bhutia and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos.5061 with 5062 of 1985

Decided on 20-8-1991.

Advocates:
A.SUBBA RAO, B.PARTHASARTHY, K.SWAMY, PARIJAT SINHA, T.TOPGAY

Headnote:ANY ORDER, INSTRUCTION, DIRECTION OR NOTIFICATION ISSUED IN EXERCISE OF THE EXECUTIVE POWER OF THE STATE WHICH IS CONTRARY TO ANY STATUTORY PROVISION IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND IS A NULLITY

       - as held in the case of State of Sikkim v. Dorjee Tshering Bhutia, AIR 1991 SC 1933 = (1991) 3 JT 456 = (1991) 4 SCC 243 = 1992(1) UJ (SC) 68 = 1991(2) Scale 378 = 1991(5) SLR 82 = 1993(3) LLJ 47 = 1991 LIC 1934 = 1991(2) LLN 818, when the source or power can be validly traced then the State action in the exercise of such power cannot be struck down on the ground that it was labelled under a different provision.

JUDGMENT

KULDIP SINGH, J.:— The Sikkim State Civil Service (hereinafter called the Service) was constituted with effect from July 1, 1977 by the rules, framed under Art. 309 of the Constitution of India, called the Sikkim State Civil Service Rules, 1977 (hereinafter called the Rules). The question for our consideration in these appeals is whether the special recruitment made by the State Government in the year 1981/ 82 and the consequent appointment of 29 officers to the services is violative of the rules and as such is liable to be quashed.

2. The Sikkim Government by a notification dated September 16, 1981 decided to make special recruitment to the service on the basis of written examination-cum-viva voce test. The notification mentioned exigencies of serviceas a ground for holding the special recruitment. As a result of the selection, 29 officers were appointed to the services by an order dated December, 13, 1982.

3. DorjeeTshering Bhutia who was working as under Secretary to the Government of Sikkim competed for the selection but failed. He challenged the notification dated September 16, 1981 and the consequent selection by way of a writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India before the Sikkim High Court. The learned single Judge of the High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the notification and the selection. At the relevant time there being no Division Bench in the Sikkim High Court to hear the appeal, the State of Sikkim and the selected candidates have, against the judgment of the learned single Judge, come up to this Court via Art. 136 of the Constitution of India. Hence these two appeals.

4. Before dealing with the points involved in the appeals it is necessary to notice the provisions of the rules in some detail. Rule 3 deals with the initial constitution of the service, It provides that the persons holding the posts mentioned therein would be deemed to be members of the service on the enforcement of the Rules. Rule 4 which provides for the method of recruitment to the services is as under:

4. Method of Recruitment to the Service: (1) Recruitment to the service after the publishment of these rules shall be by the following methods, namely:-

(a) Competitive Examinations to ba held by the Commission;

(b) Selection from among persons serving in connection with the affairs of the State of Sikkim.

(2) The proposition of vacancies to be filled in any year in accordance with Cls. (a) and (b) above, shall be 50 : 50 respectively:

Provided that the number of persons, recruited under Cl. (b) above, shall not at any time exceed 50 per cent of the total strength of the Service.

(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1), if in the opinion of the Government exigencies of the service so require, the Government may, after consultation with the Commission, adopt such method of recruitmerit to the Service other than those specified in the said sub-rule, as it may by Notification in this behalf, prescribe.

5. Rule 5 provides for the Constitution of a Selection Committee, consisting of Chairman, Sikkim Public Service Commission and three other officers, to make recruitment under R. 4(1)(b). Under Rule 6 the merit list prepared by the Selection Committee is to be forwarded to the Sikkim Public Service Commission for its final approval, Rule 8 lays down that the competitive examination for recruitment to the service is to be conducted by the Sikkim Public Service Commission. Rules 9, 10 and 11 provide for eligibility and other qualifications for admission to the competitive examination. R. 12 states that the decision of the Commission is to the eligibility or otherwise of a candidate for admission to the competitive examination shall be final.

6. The Rules provide for two methods of recruitment, competitive examination and by selection from amongst persons serving in connection with the affairs of the State of Sikkim. In respect of both these methods, it is the Sikkim Public Service Commission which is the autho






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top