SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 356

K.RAMASWAMY, N.M.KASLIWAL
B. T. Govindappa – Appellant
Versus
B. Narasimhaiah – Respondent


JUDGMENT

KASLIWAL, J.:—This appeal by special leave is directed against the Judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated 11th March, 1973 in a suit for declaration and, possession.

2. The whole case now hinges on the effect of recitals made in the registered adoption deed (Exhibit D- 1) dated 15th May, 1940 on a sale deed (Exhibit P-1) dated 22nd January, 1958 made in favour of the appellant. In order to appreciate the controversy we would narrate facts which are now held proved by the lower courts and are binding on the parties. The respondent B. Narasimhaiah was adopted by Chikkahanumiah and his wife Smt. Thimmamma by a registered adoption deed (Exhibit D- 1) dated 15th May, 1940. By this document both Smt.. Thimmamma and he husband conferred not only right of co-ownership in all the properties, on B. Narasimhaiah but also agreed that none of the parties will make any alienation of the properties mentioned in the schedule annexed to this deed. Thus the adopting parents gave a right of co-ownership in favour of the adopted son and also put a restriction that they will not transfer any property during their lifetime. The relevant recitals of Exhibit D-1 are reproduced as under:

"You mu







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top