SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 465

KULDIP SINGH, M.M.PUNCHHI
Nethala Pothuraju – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
G.NARASIMHULU, Manjula Gupta, SURUCHI AGARWAL, T.V.S.N.Chari

Judgement

KULDIP SINGH, J.:—Nethala Pothuraju, Nethala Dhananjaya, Nethala Remudu and four others (hereinafter referred to as A- 1 to A-7) were tried for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 379 and 302 read with Section 149 1. P. C. on the allegations that they caused the death of Madda Lakshamandas of village Ramaraogudem on November 1, 1980 near the Tobacco garden of A-1. The Trial Court acquitted A-7 of all the charges, A-1 to A-6 were, however, found guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 148 and 302 read with Section 149, IPC. They were sentenced to imprisonment for life. On appeal, the High Court confirmed the conviction and Sentence of A-1 to A-3. The conviction and sentence of A-4 to A-6 was set aside by the High Court and they were acquitted on the following reasoning:

"......... We feel that it would be safe to accept the evidence of P. Ws. 1 and 2 to the extent it is corroborated by the evidence of P.W.3 in so far as the presence and participation of the accused, in the attack on the deceased is concerned. Accepting the evidence of P.W.3 we hold that the identity of A- 1 to A-3 in the unlawful assembly consisting of A-1 to A-3 and some other unidentified












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top