SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 475

N.D.OJHA, S.RANGANATHAN, V.RAMASWAMI
Mahadeo Prasad Bais – Appellant
Versus
Income-tax Officer A Ward, Gorakhpur – Respondent


Advocates:
K.P.Bhatnagar, RACHNA GUPTA, S.C.Manchanda

JUDGMENT

RANGANATHAN, J.: —The Income-tax Act, 1961 replaced the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 w.e.f. 1-4- 1962. The repeal of the earlier Act necessitated the enactment of transitional provisions to facilitate the change over. Perhaps the simplest course would have been to provide that the new Act would apply to all proceedings for the assessment year 1962-63 and thereafter. The legislature, however, evolved a more complicated procedure. While Section 297(1) of the new Act declared that the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 stood repealed by the new Act, subsection (2) of the above section made detailed and meticulous provisions in clauses (a) to (m) as to whether the new Act or the old Act will govern in the various situations dealt with therein. These provisions have led to a lot of litigation and the controversy in this appeal also arises out of one such provision. We are here with the scope of proceedings for reassessment in respect of assessment year prior to 1962-63 and the answer to the question before us turns on the provisions of the following two sections of the 1961 Act:

"Section 297

297(1) xxx xxx xxx

(2) Notwithstanding the repeal of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (11 of 1922)

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top