SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 427

N.D.OJHA, J.S.VERMA, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Ranjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory Chandigarh – Respondent


Advocates:
KAMINI JAISWAL, N.D.GARG, P.CHAUDHARY, R.K.GARG, RAJIV K.GARG, U.R.Lalit

JUDGMENT

VERMA, J.:—The short question arising for decision by us is the true meaning of subsection (2) of Section 427 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and its effect.

2. For an offence of murder committed on 17-9-1978 the petitioner, Ranjit Singh, was convicted under Section 302, I.P.C. by the Sessions Judge on 6-3-1979 and sentenced to life imprisonment which was confirmed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. While the petitioner was on parole after his conviction and sentence for first murder, he was tried for the second murder committed on October 25, 1980 and convicted under Section 303, I. P. C. This conviction was altered to one under Section 302, I.P.C. and for the second murder also the petitioner was sentenced by this Court on 30-9-1983 to life imprisonment instead of death sentence. This Court while disposing of the petitioners appeal, in this manner, directed as under [AIR 1984 SC 45, Para 2]:--

"We feel that life imprisonment would be the proper sentence that should be imposed upon the appellant. We accordingly reduce the sentence of death imposed upon him and sentence him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life. However, since the present murder was committe





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top