SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 237

M.FATHIMA BEEVI, S.R.PANDIAN, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.PUNDIR, FRAMOD SVARUP, LALITA KOHLI, MANOJ SVARUP, R.K.SINGHAL

Judgment

S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, J.:-The above appeal is preferred by the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging the correctness of the judgment dated 27-8-79 rendered by the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Appeals Nos. 1799 and 1800 of 1979 along with Referred Case No. 13 of 1979 allowing the appeal preferred by both the respondents and rejecting the reference made under Section 363 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for confirmation of the sentence of death imposed on the respondents. At the outset, it may be mentioned that the first respondent, namely, Vinod Kumar alias Channi is admittedly stated to have died. During the pendency of this appeal, none of the relatives of the deceased, Vinod Kumar has applied for leave to continue the appeal within 30 days of the death of Vinod Kumar as contemplated under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Hence the appeal as against Vinod Kumar abates. Therefore, we are now called upon to decide this appeal only with reference to the second, respondent, namely Udai Bhan Singh.

2. The allegations on the basis of which both the respondents took their trial are that on 25th April 1978 at about 9.15 p. m. in front of the shop under the name and s







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top