SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 255

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. AHMADI AND K. RAMASWAMY, JJ.
Panduronga Timblo Industries, Appellant
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents
Civil Appeals No. 1511 with 1973 and 2851 of 1980, D/-13-3-1992.
WITH
V. M. Salgaokar and Bros. Pvt. Ltd., Appellant
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents
WITH
Dilip R. Salgaocar, Appellant
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents
Advocates appeared :
Mr. S.K. Mehta, Mr. Aman Vachher and Mr. Dhruv Mehta (NP), Mr. R.F. Nariman and Mrs. A. Verma, Advocates, for Appellant; Mr. Bed Brat Barua, Ms. A. Subhashini (NP) and Mr. Ashok Bhan, Advocates, for Respondents.

Headnote:

Tax Act, 1973 - Seection 2(1) - Tax Rules, 1975 - Rule 6 - Constitutional validity of tax levied - Preamble shows was enacted to impose a tax on barges in Union Territory of Daman and Diu and for matters connected therewith and was brought into force with effect from March - Barge according to S. 2(1) means every description of water craft mechanically propelled and which is used or is capable of being used as means of transport of minerals. S. 3 which is charging section provides that there shall be levied and collected on all barges used or kept for use in Union Territory a tax at rates fixed by Government by Notification in Official Gazette but not exceeding the maximum rates specified in Schedule to the Act General Clauses Act - Ss. 3(55) and 3(63) - Tax Rules, 1975 - R. 6 - Empowers Government to make rules to carry out the purposes of Act - In exercise of said power Government by a notification - Held, Court also do not think that language of Entries in List I and Entries 31 and 32 in List III would justify a narrow meaning to be given to the word boats in Entry 58 of List II - Entries relied upon have nothing to do with subject levy of tax on boats - Entry 24 in List I deals with subject of shipping and navigation on inland waterways declared to be national waterways rule of the road on such waterways and Entry 25 in List I deals with maritime shipping and navigation use of the expression mechanically propelled vessels in Entry 24 cannot restrict the ambit of Entry 58 in List II to vessels exclusively propelled by oars - On the contrary it restricts the scope of Entry24 itself and confines its application to mechanically propelled vessels - Both the Entries 24 and 25 of List I and Entry 32 in List III concern shipping and navigation and have nothing to do with the question of levy of tax on boats - Appeal dismissed

Judgment

AHMADI, J :- Is a barge a boat? The answer to this question will determine the challenge to constitutional validity of the tax levied on a barges under the Goa, Daman and Diu Barge Tax Act, 1973 (hereinafter called the Act). It is contended that the State Legislature was competent to enact the Act by virtue of the power conferred by Entry 58 in List 11 of the VIIth Schedule to the Constitution of India which permits levy of taxes on animals and boats. If barges are not boats, the Act will lose the cover provided by the said entry and will be rendered unconstitutional.

2. The Act, as the Preamble shows, was enacted to impose a tax on barges in the Union Territory of Goa, Daman and Diu and for matters connected therewith and was brought into force with effect from 1st March, 1971. Barge according to S. 2(1) means every description of water craft mechanically propelled and which is used or is capable of being used as means of transport of minerals. S. 3 which is the charging section provides that there shall be levied and collected on all barges used or kept for use in the Union Territory, a tax at the rates fixed by the Government, by Notification in the Official Gazette, but not exceeding the maximum rates specified in the Schedule to the Act. The Schedule to the Act reads as under:

"SCHEDULE

(Section 3)

Capacity of Barge Maximum annual rate per tonne

Less than 100 tonnes Rs. 3.50

100 tonnes and less than 200 tonnes Rs. 5.00

200 tonnes and less than 350 tonnes Rs. 6.00

350 tonnes and above Rs. 7.50

Note: When tax is not paid for the whole year at a time, but is paid for one or more quarters at a time, the tax so payable for each quarter shall be an amount equal to one-fourth of the annual tax plus ten per cent of that amount."

Section 19 empowers the Government to make rules to carry out the purposes of the Act. In exercise of the said power the Government by a notification framed rules called the Goa, Daman and Diu Barge Tax Rules, 1975. R. 6 lays down that every owner or the person having possession or control of a barge in the Union Territory shall pay to the Government a tax at the rates specified in the table below:

TABLE

Capacity of Barge Rate of tax payable per annum per tonne

Less than 100 tonnes Rs. 3.50 p.

100 tonnes and less than 200 tonnes Rs. 5.00 p.

200 tonnes and less than 350 tonnes Rs. 6.00 p.

350 tonnes and above Rs. 7.50 p.

The rates which have been specified are the same as specified in the Schedule to the Act. For the purpose of levy of tax under R. 7, the Taxation Authority may require the barge to be calibrated i.e. identify the carrying capacity with reference to its structural strength, reserve buoyancy and safe working height above water level. R. 8 lays down the mode of payment. R. 9 provides for the issue of tax licence and Tax Token and R. 10 provides for levy of penalty for failure to pay the tax. R. 11 empowers the seizure and detention of any barge with respect to which the tax is due under the Act, until the tax due in respect of the barge is paid. Provision is also made for refund of tax in certain circumstances. It will thus be seen from the relevant provisions of the Act and the Rules that the State Government has levied a tax on all barges used or kept for use in the Union Territory of Goa, Daman and Diu. The Government contends that since barges are boats, the State Legislature was competent to levy and collect a tax on barges under Entry 58 in List II of the Vllth Schedule to the Constitution.

3. Counsel for the appellants contended that the word boat cannot include a mechanically propelled vessel and since the definition of a barge in S. 2(1) of the Act means a mechanically propelled water craft used or capable of being used as a means of transport of minerals, it cannot be termed as a boat to attract the legislative power conferred by Entry 58 in List II of the VIIth Schedule and hence the impugned legislation is clearly incompetent. Reference was also made to the definitions of ship an

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top