SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 208

G.N.RAY, S.MOHAN
Tamboli Ramanlal Motilal – Appellant
Versus
Ghanchi Chimanlal Keshavlal – Respondent


Advocates:
P.H.Parekh, P.K.GOSWAMI, VIMAL DAVE

Judgment

MOHAN, J.:- The facts leading to this civil appeal lie in a short compass.

2. The appellant filed Civil Suit No. 1621 of 1966 on the file of the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.) at Baroda. The suit was for redemption of the properties mortgaged under registered document dated 11th December, 1950. The mortgage was executed by the plaintiff in favour of the first defendant by way of conditional sale. The period of redemption was fixed at five years from the date of transaction. The consideration was a sum of Rs. 5,000/-. The first defendant (the first respondent herein) sold a portion of the suit property in favour of the second defendant (the second respondent herein). The appellant had executed a rent note agreeing to pay an annual rent of Rs. 330/- for the premises which represented interest at 6% per annum. The first defendant had made alterations and changes in the property to the detriment of the plaintiff. In spite of the offer of the mortgage amount, the first defendant refused to accept the same and refused to allow the redemption of the properties. Hence the suit.

3. The first defendant filed the written statement to the effect that it was not a mortgage by conditional sal
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top