JUDGMENT

G. N. RAY, J.:- This Civil Appeal is directed against the order dated June 30, 1990 passed by the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India under Section 36B of the Advocates Act, 1961 in BCI Tr. Case No. 127 of 1988 arising out of the complaint made before the Bar Council of Maharashtra in D. C. No. 22 of 1987. Shri Ramesh Chandra Vithaldas Sheth made a complaint on February 9, 1987 to the D. C. No. 21 of Bar Council of Maharashtra against the respondent Devendra Bhaishankar Mehta, an Advocate practising in Bombay inter alia alleging professional misconduct against the said advocate. It was alleged by the respondent complainant, that he carries on business of manufacturing at Jhalod and he owns a proprietary firm named as M/s. Ravi Dyechem Manufacturing Industries and M/s. Vithaldas Dye Stuff Manufacturing Company. The complainant was in need of financial accommodation and was in search of a reliable financier and one Mr. Balu Bhai Modi impressed the complainant that they would give financial accommodation on being satisfied about the documents of security. It was represented to the complainant that a firm of Solicitors run by the said Shri Devendra Bhaishankar Me