SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(SC) 12

P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH, K. N. WANCHOO, B. P. SINHA, J. C. SHAH
. – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Judgment

GAJENDRAGADKAR, J.: Mr. P., who is an Advocate-on-Record of this Court and who will hereafter be called the Advocate , acted for the Board of Trustees of the Dakhina Parswa Math of Puri through its Executive Officer respondent No.2 (b) in Civil Appeal No.232 of 1954. As such Advocate he entered appearance on November 9,1957. The said appeal was heard on the 2nd and 6th of May, 1958, and by the judgment pronounced by this Court on May 20, 1958, it was dismissed with costs in favour of respondent No.2(b). The Advocate had briefed Mr. J. as a senior Advocate to lead him at the hearing of the appeal. It appears that the client had paid the Advocate Rs.500/- on the eve of the hearing of the appeal and the senior Advocate was paid Rs. 1,000/- direct by the client. The Bill of Costs and vouchers had to be filed by the Advocate on behalf of his client within six weeks from the date of judgment under Order 40 Rule 12 of the SC Rules (hereinafter called the Rules ). The said period expired during the summer vacation of the Court. After the summer vacation, the Court reopened on August 4, 1958. Meanwhile, on May 20,1958 after the Judgment was delivered by this Court, the Advocate wr
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top