SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 382

K.RAMASWAMY, KULDIP SINGH
Kirtikumar Maheshankar Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Pradipkumar Karunashanker Joshi – Respondent


Advocates:
M.N.SHROFF, M.V.GOSWAMY, Priya Hingorani, R.P.BHATT, T.U.Mehta, TANUJA SHIL

JUDGMENT

Special leave granted.

2. Pradipkumar Karunashanker Joshi was married to Kumudlata. A son named Vishal was born on July 20, 1979 and a daughter Rachna alias Rikta on August 12, 1981. Unfortunately, Kamudlata died on January 12, 1991 and the cause of death mentioned in the postmortem report was "cardiorespiratory arrest due to some chemical poisoning................" The husband Pradipkumar is facing criminal charge under S. 498A Indian Penal Code. On February 17, 1991 the police recorded statements of the children.

3. Pradipkumar and family were residing at Rajkot. After the death of Kumudlata, Vishal and Rikta left their fathers house and went to Jamnagar to live with the family of their mothers brothers/sisters. Since then both the children are living with their maternal uncle Kirtikumar Maheshankar Joshi.

4. Kirtikumar, brother of Kumudlata deceased, filed an application before the District Judge, Jamnagar under the Guardians and Wards Act (Act) on February, 13, 1991 seeking a declaration that Pradipkumar, the father of the children, was unfit to be the guardian of Vishal and Rikta and a further prayer that he be appointed as guardian of the minor children. An interim inju












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top