SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 409

A.S.ANAND, L.M.SHARMA
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Lt. Col. Komal Charan – Respondent


Advocates:
Altaf Ahmed, GOBINDA MUKHOTY, KITTY KUMARAMANGALAM, P.PARMESHVARAN, SUSHMA SURI, V.J.Francis, V.SUBRAHMANYAM

JUDGMENT

SHARMA, J.:- Thequestionswhichfall for decision in these cases are as to whether the officers appointed on whole-time basis in the National Cadet Corps are governed by the Fundamental Rules applicable to the civil servants serving the Union of India and accordingly entitled to continue in service until the age of fifty-eight years or they retire under the terms and conditions of their service as contained in the Government order being letter dated 23-5-1980. The Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi, by the impugned judgment, has agreed with the respondents that they will remain in service till they attain the age of fifty-eight years in view of the provisions in Fundamental Rule 56 (a).

2. Special Leave is granted.

3. The respondents were earlier serving in the Armed Forces from 1962-67. After the expiry of their tenure they applied for appointment under the scheme of re-employment of ex-service officers in the National Cadet Corps and they were granted N.C.C. commission on whole-time basis. The grant of permanent commission was on the terms and conditions as laid down in the aforesaid letter dated 23-5-1980 which had inter alia fixed the age of retirement at fifty five












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top