SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 727

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, M.M.PUNCHHI
K. S. Pariapoornan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
G.VISHVANATHA IYER, K.R.NAMBIAR, P.S.POTI, S.BALAKRISHNAN, T.S.KRISHNAMURTHY IYER, V.B.SAHARYA

JUDGMENT

Retroactivity of some of the provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as amended by Land Acquisition Amendment Act, 68 of 1984, has been a source of good amount of conflict of opinion in this Court as well as among the High Courts in the country. We are not happy in adding to it but we find it inescapable, convinced as we are, that the view taken by a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Union of India v. Zora Singh, C.A. No. 4568/91 decided on 22-11-1991 (reported in 1991 (4) JT (SC) 538) requires reconsideration. We shall first state the facts, in S. L. P. No. 5514 of 1990 to indicate how the question arises.

2. The notification under S. 3(1) of the Kerala Land Acquisition Act (corresponding to S. 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1894) was issued on 21-3-1978. Declaration under S. 6 was made on 15-5-1979. The Land Acquisition Officer (Collector) passed the award on 30-12-1980 and possession of acquired lands taken sometime in 1981. The claimants were not satisfied with the award. They asked for a reference under S. 18 which was made. The Civil Court gave its decision on 28-2-1985, enhancing the compensation.

3. The Land Acquisition Amendment Bill, which was later enacted in




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top