SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 461

N.D.OJHA, S.RANGANATHAN, V.RAMASWAMI
Gokal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Leave granted.

2. All these appeals arise out of acquisition of certain lands in the village of Dundahera adjoining Delhi-Gurgaon Road. It is not necessary to set out the facts or figures in great detail because it is common ground that compensation payable in respect of lands in the same village which were acquired on 31-10-1974 came up for consideration of this Court in Paltoo Singh v. State of Haryana (Civil Appeals 1251-1252/82) which were disposed of by this Court on 1st April, 1982. This Court, after considering all the facts and circumstances and the details given in the High Court judgments as well as in the judgments of the lower courts came to the conclusion that a compensation of Rs. 17,50 per sq. yard would be quite reasonable. Though there are, large number of appeals before us it is common ground that there are four dates of acquisition on which these lands have been acquired. The relevant dates of the S. 4 notifications are 20th March, 1975, 26th May, 1976, 3rd September, 1976 and 6th January, 1978. The only question, therefore, that arises before us is regarding the adjustment that should be made for the difference in these dates of acquisition from the date












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top