SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 120

M.M.PUNCHHI, YOGESHWAR DAYAL, L.M.SHARMA
Shyamalendu Nag – Appellant
Versus
State Of Manipur – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Subhashini, AMITA GROVER, ASHOK BHAN, K.K.LAHRI, P.K.GOSWAMI, S.K.NANDY

JUDGMENT

SHARMA, J.:- The appellant, while he was serving in the Accounts Department as Divisional Accountant, applied for appointment to the post of Munsif Magistrate in Manipur Judicial Service and was selected. Accordingly an appointment letter was issued on 25th of May, 1977, and he promptly indicated his intention to join the new Post. Since he had to be relieved from the accounts department for joining the new assignment, he made an application for the purpose. A copy of his appointment letter was also sent directly by the State Government to the Accountant General, Assam, with a request to release him immediately. The appellant was, however, not relieved and a letter was sent from, the office of the Accountant General to the Law Secretary to the Government of Manipur for granting one months time. This letter was sent on 20th of June, 1977. By another letter dated 22nd of July, 1977 a further one months time was requested for by the office of the Accountant General. Even after two extensions the office of the Accountant General did not release the appellant and instead sent a telegram for further time on the 24th of August, 1977. By the impugned order dated 7th of September, 1



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top