1992 Supreme(SC) 500
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KULDIP SINGH AND K. RAMASWAMY, JJ.
State of Rajasthan and others, Appellants
Versus
Kishan Singh, Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 4209 of 1991 (arising out of s.L.P. (C) Nos. 16413, 16487,16488, 16506, 16642,16084, 15071, 15047, 16504, 16505, 16507, 16619, 16620, 16641 and 14233 of 1990 and S.L.P. (C) Nos. 9481 and 12892 of 1991), D/-6-8-1992.
ARUNESHVAR GUPTA, Chetna Anand, GUDWILL INDIVER, KAMAKSHI S.MEHLWAI, P.H.Parekh
Headnote:
Rajasthan Colonization Act, 1954 - Section 22 - Liable to pay – Trespasser - Arrear of land revenue - Whether said notification validly confers powers and functions of the Collector under Act upon Colonization Tahsildar - Each agricultural year during the whole or any part whereof he has been in such unauthorised occupation of land, a penalty which may extend to fifty times annual rent or assessment as the case may be for first act of trespass - In case of each subsequent act of trespass he shall by order of Collector be liable to commitment to civil prison for a term which may extend to three months and to pay penalty to extent as aforesaid amount of such penalty shall be recovered as an arrear of land revenue - Held, It is no doubt correct that notification is not happily worded - It only shows the casual manner in which Government-documents are drafted – Court are however of view that wording of the notification fully conveys the intention of the State Government. Section 22 of the Act provides summary proceedings for the ejectment of trespassers from Government lands - Various sub-sections of Section 22 provide a scheme for gettings trespass on Government lands vacated - In nature of provisions of Section 22 of Act proceedings under various sub-sections have to be initiated and action taken by same authority - Proceedings under Section 22 of Act being quasi-judicial authority entrusted with powers of Collector has to be invested with the powers under all the sub-sections to enable said authority to proceed in accordance with scheme of Act - In that view of the matter there is no scope for conferring some of powers under Section 22 on Tehsildars and remaining to be left with Collector - High Court came to the conclusion that the powers and functions under Section 22 which were being conferred upon Tahsildar should have been mentioned before or after word such in notification - Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT
KULDIP SINGH, J.:- The Rajasthan Government issued notification dated May 30, 1978 under S. 2(1)(a) of the Rajasthan Colonisation Act, 1954 (the Act) appointing the Colonisation Tehsildars to perform the functions and exercise the powers of the Collector under Section 22 of the Act. The short question for our determination is whether the said notification, validly confers the powers and the functions of the Collector under the Act upon the Colonisation Tehsildars.
2. Section 2(i)(a) and Section 22 of the Act, which are relevant, are reproduced hereunder,.-
"Section 2(i)(a) - Collector means the Collector of the district and includes-
(a) Any officer appointed by the State Government to perform all or any of the functions and exercise all or any of the powers of the Collector under this Act.
22. Unauthorised occupation of land and re-entry.- (1) Any person who occupied or continues to occupy any land in a Colony to which he has no right or title or without lawful authority shall be regarded a trespasser and may be summarily evicted therefrom by the Collector at any time at his own motion or upon the application of an aggrieved person at whose disposal such land has been placed; and any crops, trees and buildings or any other constructions, erected or anything deposited on such land shall, if not removed within such reasonable time as the Collector may from time to time fix for the purpose, be liable to be forfeited to the State and to be disposed of as the Collector may direct:
Provided that the Collector may, in lieu of ordering the forfeiture of any such building or other construction, order the demolition of the whole or any part thereof.
(2) Such trespasser shall further be liable to pay, for each agricultural year during the whole or any part whereof he has been in such unauthorised occupation of the land, a penalty which may extend to fifty times the annual rent, or assessment, as the case may be, for the first act of trespass. In the case of each subsequent act of trespass, he shall, by the order of the Collector, be liable to commitment to civil prison for a term which may extend to three months and to pay penalty to the extent as aforesaid. The amount of such penalty shall be recovered as an arrear of land revenue.
(3) Before taking proceedings for eviction under sub-section (1), the Collector shall cause to be served on the person reported to be occupying or continuing to occupy land without lawful authority, a notice specifying such land and calling on him to appear. and show cause why he should not be evicted therefrom.
(4) In any of the following cases namely-
(i) where the trespasser neither vacates the land nor makes appearance in response to the notice issued under sub- section (3); or
(ii) where in response to such notice the trespasser does not vacate the land and makes appearance but-
(a) does not show any cause; or
(b) makes any representation which is rejected after such enquiry and hearing as may be necessary in the circumstances of the case;
the Collector shall, unless in the case covered by clause (ii) above the trespasser undertakes to vacate the land within a weeks time and vacates it within such time, order removal of the trespasser from such land and shall remove or depute any person to remove him therefrom and take possession thereof."
3. The notification dated May 30, 1978 .issued by the State Government under Section 2(i)(a) of the Act reads as under:
"In exercise of the powers conferred by subclause (a) of clause (i) of Section 2 of the Rajasthan Colonisation Act, 1954 (Rajasthan Act o. XXVII of 1954), the State Government hereby appoints all Colonisation Tehsildars of the State to perform such functions and to exercise "such powers" of collector under Section 22 of this Act in the villages specified as Colony from time to time under this Act and are falling in their respective jurisdiction."
4. The Colonisation Tehsildars initiated proceedings against various persons under Section 22 of the Act and al