SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 427

M.M.PUNCHHI, S.R.PANDIAN
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Mahabaleshwar Gourya Naik – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK SHARMA, M.VIRAPPA, URMILA SIRUR

Judgment

S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, J.:- This appeal by special leave under Art. 136 of the Constitution of India is preferred by the State of Karnataka challenging the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka rendered in Criminal Appeal No. 413 of 1978.

2. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows:

The respondent, Mahabaleshwar Gourya Naik who was aged about 18 years at the time of alleged incident was tried for an offence punishable under Ss. 341, 354, 376 and 323, I.P.C. on the allegation that on 3-10-77 at about 2.10p.m. on Nidagod-Heggodmane road at a distance of 2 furlongs away from Nidagod cross, wrongfully restrained the victim girl, who before the trial of the case is said to have committed suicide, and committed rape without her consent by forcibly taking her to the nearby jungle which is at a distance of about 40 metres from the road and that during the course of the said offence, the respondent caused hurt to the victim. At the time of the occurrence, the girl was aged about 15 years, studying in IX Standard in Siddavinayaka Girls High School at Siddapur. As the prosecutrix Palakashi died even before the trial commenced, the prosecution has rested its case only on





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top