S.MOHAN, G.N.RAY, M.M.PUNCHHI
Nandu Mal Girdhari Lal: Amar Nath Ashok Kumar: Atma Ram Kishan Lal: Hari Ram Prahalad Rai – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
Judgment
MOHAN, J.:- Since common-points of law are involved, all these appeals are dealt with under one judgment.
2. The appellants, commission agents were carrying on trade in the notified market area. The attack is as to the levy of market fee on them in relation to the business of khandsari sugar. To highlight the issue involved we will set out the legal background first.
3. The U. P. Legislature passed an Act called U. P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam in the year 1964 as Act 25 of 1964. The object of the Act was to regulate the sale and purchase of agricultural produce and for the establishment, superintendence and control of markets in U. P. Section 5 of the Act confers powers on the State Government in relation to regulation of sale and purchase of any agricultural produce in any area wherein such transactions are usually carried on and for that purpose to declare the area as a market area. This declaration is to be by way of a notification. Section 7 empowers even a portion of that market area be specified as a principal market yard, while such other portions could be specified as sub-market yard. The effect of such declaration of market area is spoken to under Section 9. In
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.