SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 636

KULDIP SINGH, N.M.KASLIWAL
Chandu Chandrahas – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
amicus curiae, Syed M.Hussain, U.N.BACHHAVAT, Uma Nath Singh

Judgment

KULDIP SINGH, J.:- Special leave granted.

2. Chandu alias Chandrahas was tried for the murder of one Hemrai. He was convicted by the trial Court on November 23, 1984 under Sections 302 and 201, Indian Penal Code. He was sentenced to imprisonment for life under Section 302 and was given five years rigorous imprisonment under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Appeal filed by him was dismissed by the High Court.

3. The prosecution case is entirely based on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution story is that sometime before the occurrence the cattle belonging to the appellant entered the fields of the deceased thereby damaging the standing crops which resulted in a quarrel between the two. The matter was reported to the village panchayat. It is further alleged that the appellant gave threats that he would kill the deceased. On February 2, 1984, sometime in the evening the deceased told his family members that he was going to village Renutola. The appellant was grazing his cattle in the Nalla which separates the two villages of Singhanbhedi and Renutola. The deceased and the accused were seen near that Nalla. The deceased did not return till late night. The dead-body of the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top