B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, M.M.PUNCHHI
Ambalika Padhi – Appellant
Versus
Radhakrishna Padhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
JEEVAN REDDY, J. :- This Civil Appeal is preferred by the plaintiffs against the judgment and decrees of the Orissa High Court made in three appeals viz., F..A. No, 145 of 1971, F.A. No. 9 of 1972 and F.A. No. 15 of 1972 (reported in AIR 1981 Orissa 63),
2. The suit was instituted by Smt. Urmila Padhi for declaration of her title to plaint B schedule lands and confirmation of her possession thereon. The basis of her claim was the partition effected on 22-6-1968. Alternatively, she prayed for a fresh partition. (Certain other minor reliefs were sought for which need not be set out here). According to her, Judhishter (D-1) and Srinivas were brothers. Defendants 2 and 3 are the sons of first defendant. Srinivas had a son, Khalli who died long prior to the institution of the suit. Plaintiff is his widow. First defendant was the karta of thejoint family and was managing its affairs. In the year 1967, there was a partition wherein plaintiff was given six annas share while 10 annas share was kept by first defendant and his family. A deed of partition was executed on 22-6-1968 and registered on 27-6-1968. Since then, parties are in separate possession and enjoyment of the lands fall
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.