SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 697

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, M.M.PUNCHHI
Ambalika Padhi – Appellant
Versus
Radhakrishna Padhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

JEEVAN REDDY, J. :- This Civil Appeal is preferred by the plaintiffs against the judgment and decrees of the Orissa High Court made in three appeals viz., F..A. No, 145 of 1971, F.A. No. 9 of 1972 and F.A. No. 15 of 1972 (reported in AIR 1981 Orissa 63),

2. The suit was instituted by Smt. Urmila Padhi for declaration of her title to plaint B schedule lands and confirmation of her possession thereon. The basis of her claim was the partition effected on 22-6-1968. Alternatively, she prayed for a fresh partition. (Certain other minor reliefs were sought for which need not be set out here). According to her, Judhishter (D-1) and Srinivas were brothers. Defendants 2 and 3 are the sons of first defendant. Srinivas had a son, Khalli who died long prior to the institution of the suit. Plaintiff is his widow. First defendant was the karta of thejoint family and was managing its affairs. In the year 1967, there was a partition wherein plaintiff was given six annas share while 10 annas share was kept by first defendant and his family. A deed of partition was executed on 22-6-1968 and registered on 27-6-1968. Since then, parties are in separate possession and enjoyment of the lands fall































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top